Skip to content

SPI

By the end of this lesson, you will be able to

  1. Explain the four SPI modes in terms of CPOL and CPHA, and choose the mode that matches a device’s datasheet.
  2. Decode an SPI trace in full: SCLK, MOSI, MISO and CS.
  3. Compare SPI and I2C on wire count, speed, and wiring several devices.

Takes about 70 minutes (concepts 15 · practice 25 · lab 25 · check 5). The lab needs a four-channel logic analyzer that can accept 3.3 V.

Two review questions from the previous two lessons.

  1. Which bit does UART send first, and which bit does I2C send first (lessons 5.1 and 5.2)?
  2. In I2C, how does the master pick which device to talk to? Without an address, what else could be used to pick one?

Open examples/13_spi_modes.c. This program draws the byte 0xA5 in all four SPI modes, marking a ^ under the edge where the receiver samples the value. Predict before you run it: in mode 3, does the receiver sample on SCLK’s rising or falling edge?

Terminal window
gcc -std=c11 -Wall -Wextra -o spi_modes examples/13_spi_modes.c
./spi_modes

Mode 3 samples on the rising edge, just like mode 0, even though SCLK idles at a different level. Modes 1 and 2 sample on the falling edge. The last lines compare two real SPIs on this board — the radar’s hardware SPI at 25 MHz against the header’s bit-banged SPI at around 67 kHz — hundreds of times slower.

SPI has four signals: SCLK (the master’s clock), MOSI (master out), MISO (slave out), and CS or SS (selects a slave, usually active low). Data travels in both directions at once — every SCLK beat, the master sends one bit and receives one bit. “Reading” from a slave therefore always means sending something out at the same time.

Mode CPOL (SCLK’s idle level) CPHA Receiver samples at Name in the PDL’s settings
0 0 (low) 0 First edge = rising CY_SCB_SPI_CPHA0_CPOL0
1 0 (low) 1 Second edge = falling CY_SCB_SPI_CPHA1_CPOL0
2 1 (high) 0 First edge = falling CY_SCB_SPI_CPHA0_CPOL1
3 1 (high) 1 Second edge = rising CY_SCB_SPI_CPHA1_CPOL1

Choosing a mode isn’t guesswork — every device’s datasheet states it, either by mode name, by CPOL/CPHA values, or with a timing diagram showing which edge the data is sampled at. If the datasheet only gives a diagram, look for two things: which level SCLK idles at (CPOL), and whether data must be stable at the first edge or the second (CPHA). The SPI connected to the radar in the SDK’s BSP is set to subMode = CY_SCB_SPI_MOTOROLA, sclkMode = CY_SCB_SPI_CPHA0_CPOL0 (mode 0), enableMsbFirst = true, 8-bit data, and CS active low on every pin (cycfg_peripherals.c lines 645-673).

2. Real SPI on this board: hardware versus bit-banged

Section titled “2. Real SPI on this board: hardware versus bit-banged”

The BGT60TR13C radar’s SPI uses SCB3, with MISO on P21.4, MOSI on P21.5, CLK on P21.6, CS on P21.7, and an IRQ pin on P20.3, at 25 Mbps (02_radar_presence.c lines 25-29). This number matches the arithmetic: a 100 MHz clock, a divider of 0, and oversample = 4, exactly as the PDL’s documentation says a master needs clk_scb equal to oversample times the data rate. The radar’s task configures SPI with Cy_SCB_SPI_Init(), binds an ISR with Cy_SysInt_Init(), selects the slave with Cy_SCB_SPI_SetActiveSlaveSelect(), then calls Cy_SCB_SPI_Enable() (radar_task.c lines 152-173), and the actual transfers use interrupt-driven Cy_SCB_SPI_Transfer().

The SDK’s radar platform file contains a great debugging lesson. Its original driver waited for a transfer to finish with an unbounded while loop — if the SPI interrupt was ever missed once, this loop would spin forever. The SDK team measured this on a real board and found the Radar page’s values stuck every time, after about eight seconds of running, so they changed it to a bounded wait that cancels the transfer and returns an error instead. “A bounded spin turns an unrecoverable wedge into an error return.” (bento_bgt60trxx_platform.c lines 11-36 and 85-102, Apache-2.0, original Copyright 2022 Infineon Technologies AG, adapted in tesaiot-pse84-devkit-sdk)

SPI on the header, in the Developer Hub’s Header I/O Test example, is bit-banged mode 0 on P9.3 (SCK), P9.2 (MOSI), P9.1 (MISO), P9.0 (CS). The CPU sets each pin one bit at a time with Cy_GPIO_Write(), delaying 5 microseconds between steps — much slower than hardware, but easy to read with a logic analyzer, and enough for an 8-byte test. (The SDK’s radar example documentation warns of a header “chip-select trap” between P9.0 and P9.2 — in the lab, go by the pins the example you flashed prints on its screen.)

Aspect SPI I2C
Wire count 3 shared wires (SCLK, MOSI, MISO) + one CS per slave 2 shared wires (SCL, SDA) for every device
Selecting a device With the CS wire With a 7-bit address in the data
Speed on this board The radar’s SPI: 25 MHz The sensor bus: 400 kHz
Direction Full-duplex, send and receive at once Half-duplex
Receiver confirms receipt No (no ACK) Yes, ACK/NACK per byte
Wire characteristics Push-pull, sharp edges, drives fast Open-drain with pull-ups, speed limited by wire capacitance

SPI suits high-volume data from a few devices — a radar, a display, flash memory. I2C suits many low-data-rate sensors, saving chip pins. Because SPI has no ACK, proving a wire is good means reading a value you already know the answer to, such as a chip’s ID register — the same approach used with I2C in lesson 5.2.

examples/13_spi_modes.c runs in three parts.

  • Part 1 produces the waveform of one byte, MSB first, following each mode’s CPOL and CPHA.
  • Part 2 draws SCLK and MOSI as lines, with the idle level before and after the frame, and a ^ under the sampled edge.
  • Part 3 compares the radar’s hardware SPI speed against the header’s bit-banged one.

Try changing things and predicting the result before you run it.

  1. Change the byte to 0x31, the second byte the Header I/O Test example sends, and draw it in mode 0.
  2. If the master uses mode 0 but the slave uses mode 1, which edge does the slave sample at, and how would the resulting data likely be corrupted?
  3. Adjust it to print LSB first, and explain what setting has to match between the master and the decoder for this to work.

Open practice/13_spi_decode.c, a four-wire SPI decoder like a logic analyzer’s. This is module 5’s last lesson, so there are the most gaps to fill in: 6.

  1. Extract CPOL and CPHA from the mode number.
  2. Clear state whenever CS is inactive.
  3. Tell the leading edge apart from the trailing edge.
  4. Choose which edge to sample, based on CPHA.
  5. Shift bits into a byte MSB first, from the value that was stable before the edge.
  6. Store the byte once 8 bits are collected, without writing past the storage.
Terminal window
gcc -std=c11 -Wall -Wextra -o spi_decode practice/13_spi_decode.c && ./spi_decode

The tests use the real frame the Header I/O Test example sends the first time SPI is pressed: A5 31 00 5A 01 02 03, followed by an XOR checksum CE, plus a case with the wrong mode set, where the decoder must get bytes that don’t match what was sent.

Try it yourself for at least 15 minutes first, then open solution/13_spi_decode.c. The key point: the solution reads the value from s[i - 1], the value that was stable before the edge — the same thing a receiver’s flip-flop actually captures. If the other side changes the data right at that same edge (a mode mismatch), the receiver gets the previous round’s bit. The wrong-mode test case exists to prove this. Notice that this test passes even before you fill anything in, because empty code also produces a mismatched byte. A test that passes against empty code only means something once its paired test (decoding with the correct mode, getting A5) also passes.

Answer the 5 questions in quiz.yaml (shown at the bottom of this page on the website), covering all three objectives. Getting 4 or more right counts as finishing the lesson.

Task: capture a real SPI transaction on the header, decode it by eye and with a decoder, and prove the effect of setting the wrong mode.

  1. Flash the QWA309 — Header I/O Test example from the Developer Hub (if you haven’t already in lesson 5.1).
  2. Connect a four-channel logic analyzer to P9.3 (SCK), P9.2 (MOSI), P9.1 (MISO), P9.0 (CS), and ground. Check the pin names against the Port: line the example prints on screen when you press the button.
  3. Set the trigger to CS’s falling edge, then press the SPI ESP32 button on screen. The screen prints a TX req: line with eight bytes. (With no paired test board, the screen shows FAIL, but the master still sends the frame out every time.)
  4. Decode the first byte by eye: which level does SCLK idle at, which edge is MOSI stable at, then read 8 bits MSB first. You should get A5.
  5. Set the decoder to SPI mode 0, MSB first, CS active low, and compare it against the TX req: line. Then change the decoder to mode 1 and see what the byte changes to.
  6. Measure the length of one bit and how long CS stays low, and compare with the worked example’s estimate of about 15 microseconds per bit. How much do they differ, and why?

Evidence to keep in your portfolio: a four-channel waveform picture with the first byte labelled by hand, a picture of the decoder’s mode-0 result matching TX req:, a picture of the result when set to mode 1, and the timing numbers you measured in step 6.

  • Read the “Configure Data Rate” section in the header of cy_scb_spi.h @ release-v3.24.0, and calculate the divider and oversample setting needed for 10 MHz SPI from a 100 MHz clock.
  • Look at sigrok protocol decoders and see how an SPI decoder can be layered with a device decoder (such as an SPI flash chip).
  • Challenge: use this lesson’s decoder to read a CSV file you exported from your own PulseView capture.

Next lesson, moving into module 6: lesson 6.1, unit tests on the host

  • If a new device’s datasheet only gave a timing diagram, what would you read off it to choose a mode, and how would you prove you chose correctly?
  • How many unbounded wait loops are in your own code, and what would happen if the interrupt one of them waits for were ever missed once?

Try the real thing on the TESAIoT Dev Kit: open an example on the Developer Hub to read the code, download it, or flash a prebuilt firmware image.

  • QWA309 — Header I/O Test — diagnostic: tests all Arduino header I/O (I2C 3V3, UART SCB9, bit-banged SPI, GPIO P13, PWM, an ADC net, and 4000T EZI2C), with a console UI.

Review questions

Answer on your own first, then open the answer.

  1. A datasheet says SCLK idles high and the device samples on the rising edge, the second edge after leaving idle. Which mode? (Objective 1)

    1. โหมด 0 (CPOL 0, CPHA 0)
    2. โหมด 1 (CPOL 0, CPHA 1)
    3. โหมด 2 (CPOL 1, CPHA 0)
    4. โหมด 3 (CPOL 1, CPHA 1)
    Show answer

    Answer: D. โหมด 3 (CPOL 1, CPHA 1)

    ว่างที่ระดับสูงคือ CPOL = 1 อ่านที่ขอบที่สองคือ CPHA = 1 จึงเป็นโหมด 3 ซึ่งใน PDL คือ CY_SCB_SPI_CPHA1_CPOL1

  2. The radar SPI in the BSP uses sclkMode = CY_SCB_SPI_CPHA0_CPOL0 and enableMsbFirst = true. Which is right? (Objective 1)

    1. โหมด 0 SCLK ว่างที่ระดับต่ำ อ่านที่ขอบขาขึ้น ส่ง MSB ก่อน
    2. โหมด 3 SCLK ว่างที่ระดับสูง ส่ง LSB ก่อน
    3. โหมด 0 แต่ส่ง LSB ก่อนเหมือน UART
    4. ไม่ใช่ SPI แบบ Motorola
    Show answer

    Answer: A. โหมด 0 SCLK ว่างที่ระดับต่ำ อ่านที่ขอบขาขึ้น ส่ง MSB ก่อน

    CPHA0_CPOL0 คือโหมด 0 และ MSB first ตรงข้ามกับ UART ที่ส่ง LSB ก่อน subMode ของค่าตั้งนี้คือ CY_SCB_SPI_MOTOROLA

  3. In a mode 0 capture with CS low, MOSI at eight consecutive rising edges reads 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1. What byte did the master send? (Objective 2)

    1. 0x31
    2. 0x8C
    3. 0x13
    4. 0xC8
    Show answer

    Answer: A. 0x31

    SPI ส่ง MSB ก่อน 0011 0001 คือ 0x31 ซึ่งเป็นไบต์ที่สองในเฟรมของตัวอย่าง Header I/O Test ถ้าอ่านแบบ LSB ก่อนจะได้ 0x8C ซึ่งผิด

  4. An SPI decoder shows bytes that look shifted by one bit. Which causes are possible? (choose all that apply) (Objective 2)

    1. ตั้ง CPHA ของ decoder ไม่ตรงกับอุปกรณ์ จึงอ่านที่ขอบที่ข้อมูลกำลังเปลี่ยน
    2. ตั้ง CS ของ decoder ผิดขั้ว หรือผิดช่อง ทำให้นับบิตเริ่มผิดจุด
    3. สาย MISO ยาวเกินไปเพียงอย่างเดียว
    4. SPI ไม่มี ACK จึงเลื่อนเสมอ
    Show answer

    Answer: A. ตั้ง CPHA ของ decoder ไม่ตรงกับอุปกรณ์ จึงอ่านที่ขอบที่ข้อมูลกำลังเปลี่ยน · B. ตั้ง CS ของ decoder ผิดขั้ว หรือผิดช่อง ทำให้นับบิตเริ่มผิดจุด

    decoder ต้องรู้ขอบที่อ่านและจุดเริ่มของไบต์ ถ้าอ่านผิดขอบจะได้บิตของรอบก่อน ถ้า CS ผิดจุดเริ่มก็ผิด แบบฝึกของบทนี้มี test ที่พิสูจน์ข้อแรก ส่วนการไม่มี ACK ไม่ได้ทำให้บิตเลื่อน

  5. Which comparisons of SPI and I2C are correct? (choose all that apply) (Objective 3)

    1. SPI เลือกอุปกรณ์ด้วยสาย CS แยกต่อ slave ส่วน I2C เลือกด้วย address บนสายร่วม
    2. บนบอร์ดนี้ SPI ของเรดาร์ทำงานที่ 25 MHz ขณะที่บัสเซนเซอร์ I2C ทำงานที่ 400 kHz
    3. SPI มี ACK ทุกไบต์เหมือน I2C
    4. SPI รับและส่งพร้อมกันได้ (full-duplex)
    5. เพิ่มอุปกรณ์ I2C อีกตัวต้องเพิ่มสายอีกเส้นเสมอ
    Show answer

    Answer: A. SPI เลือกอุปกรณ์ด้วยสาย CS แยกต่อ slave ส่วน I2C เลือกด้วย address บนสายร่วม · B. บนบอร์ดนี้ SPI ของเรดาร์ทำงานที่ 25 MHz ขณะที่บัสเซนเซอร์ I2C ทำงานที่ 400 kHz · D. SPI รับและส่งพร้อมกันได้ (full-duplex)

    SPI ไม่มี ACK จึงต้องพิสูจน์สายด้วยการอ่านค่าที่รู้คำตอบ ส่วน I2C เพิ่มอุปกรณ์บนสองสายเดิมได้ตราบที่ address ไม่ชนกัน

Cite this lesson

If you teach from this lesson or reuse it in slides or documents, credit it with the text below. If you changed it, add (adapted) after the title.

"SPI" from TESA Open Knowledge by the Thai Embedded Systems Association (TESA), https://github.com/tesaiot/tesa-qualification-program, licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0

Thai attribution: "SPI" จาก TESA Open Knowledge โดยสมาคมสมองกลฝังตัวไทย (Thai Embedded Systems Association: TESA) https://github.com/tesaiot/tesa-qualification-program สัญญาอนุญาต CC BY-NC 4.0

Lesson link: https://tesaiot.github.io/tesa-qualification-program/en/courses/embedded-c-foundations/m05-serial-buses/l03-spi/

This lesson adapts the source below; keep its credit too.
https://github.com/tesaiot/tesaiot-pse84-devkit-sdk/tree/ef72c1b658178eee8c38b1e47d28b006f80a59b5 · SDK examples and docs are linked at this commit, not copied into this course. Lessons quote short excerpts (at most 25 lines) with a link to the file at this commit and the credit (Apache-2.0, tesaiot-pse84-devkit-sdk).

Full guide: how to cite TESA

TESA Open Knowledge · © 2026 สมาคมสมองกลฝังตัวไทย (TESA) · CC BY-NC 4.0

Content is licensed CC BY-NC 4.0. Reuse it non-commercially and credit the Thai Embedded Systems Association (TESA) every time. · How to cite TESA